The PACIFIC ontology for heterogeneous data management in cardiology.

With the emergence of health data warehouses and major initiatives to collect and analyze multi-modal and multisource data, data organization becomes central. In the PACIFIC-PRESERVED (PhenomApping, ClassIFication, and Innovation for Cardiac Dysfunction - Heart Failure with PRESERVED LVEF Study, NCT04189029) study, a data driven research project aiming at redefining and profiling the Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF), an ontology was developed by different data experts in cardiology to enable better data management in a complex study context (multisource, multiformat, multimodality, multipartners). The PACIFIC ontology provides a cardiac data management framework for the phenomapping of patients. It was built upon the BMS-LM (Biomedical Study -Lifecycle Management) core ontology and framework, proposed in a previous work to ensure data organization and provenance throughout the study lifecycle (specification, acquisition, analysis, publication). The BMS-LM design pattern was applied to the PACIFIC multisource variables. In addition, data was structured using a subset of MeSH headings for diseases, technical procedures, or biological processes, and using the Uberon ontology anatomical entities. A total of 1372 variables were organized and enriched with annotations and description from existing ontologies and taxonomies such as LOINC to enable later semantic interoperability. Both, data structuring using the BMS-LM framework, and its mapping with published standards, foster interoperability of multimodal cardiac phenomapping datasets.

Ontological Modeling of Clinical Study Forms.

The use of eCRFs is now commonplace in clinical research studies. We propose here an ontological model of these forms allowing to describe them, to express their granularity and to link them to the relevant entities of the study in which they are used. It has been developed in a psychiatry project but its generality may allow a wider application.

The BMS-LM ontology for biomedical data reporting throughout the lifecycle of a research study: From data model to ontology.

Biomedical research data reuse and sharing is essential for fostering research progress. To this aim, data producers need to master data management and reporting through standard and rich metadata, as encouraged by open data initiatives such as the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) guidelines. This helps data re-users to understand and reuse the shared data with confidence. Therefore, dedicated frameworks are required. The provenance reporting throughout a biomedical study lifecycle has been proposed as a way to increase confidence in data while reusing it. The Biomedical Study - Lifecycle Management (BMS-LM) data model has implemented provenance and lifecycle traceability for several multimodal-imaging techniques but this is not enough for data understanding while reusing it. Actually, in the large scope of biomedical research, a multitude of metadata sources, also called Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs), are available for data annotation. In addition, data producers uses local terminologies or KOSs, containing vernacular terms for data reporting. The result is a set of heterogeneous KOSs (local and published) with different formats and levels of granularity. To manage the inherent heterogeneity, semantic interoperability is encouraged by the Research Data Management (RDM) community. Ontologies, and more specifically top ontologies such as BFO and DOLCE, make explicit the metadata semantics and enhance semantic interoperability. Based on the BMS-LM data model and the BFO top ontology, the BioMedical Study - Lifecycle Management (BMS-LM) core ontology is proposed together with an associated framework for semantic interoperability between heterogeneous KOSs. It is made of four ontological levels: top/core/domain/local and aims to build bridges between local and published KOSs. In this paper, the conversion of the BMS-LM data model to a core ontology is detailed. The implementation of its semantic interoperability in a specific domain context is explained and illustrated with examples from small animal preclinical research.